in

WHO clarifies comments on asymptomatic spread of Covid-19: ‘There’s much unknown’

Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’s technical lead for coronavirus response and head of its emerging diseases and zoonoses unit, said during a media briefing in Geneva on Monday that “it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”

But then on Tuesday, during the live Q&A, she clarified “this is a major unknown.”

2 studies show many people who tested positive for Covid-19 displayed no symptoms

“The majority of transmission that we know about is that people who have symptoms transmit the virus to other people through infectious droplets — but there are a subset of people who don’t develop symptoms, and to truly understand how many people don’t have symptoms, we don’t actually have that answered yet,” Van Kerkhove said.

“We do know that some people who are asymptomatic, or some people who don’t have symptoms, can transmit the virus on,” she said. “So what we need to better understand is how many of the people in the population don’t have symptoms and separately how many of those individuals go on to transmit to others.”

On Monday, Van Kerkhove had said that what appear to be asymptomatic cases of Covid-19 often turn out to be cases of mild disease.

Infected people without symptoms might be driving the spread of coronavirus more than we realized

“When we actually go back and we say how many of them were truly asymptomatic, we find out that many have really mild disease,” Van Kerkhove said on Monday.

“They’re not quote-unquote Covid symptoms — meaning they may not have developed fever yet, they may not have had a significant cough, or they may not have shortness of breath — but some may have mild disease,” Van Kerkhove said. “Having said that, we do know that there can be people who are truly asymptomatic.”

Van Kerkhove added that she was referring to reports from WHO member states when she made her comments on Monday.

“What I was referring to yesterday in the press conference were very few studies — some two or three studies that had been published that actually try to follow asymptomatic cases, so people who are infected, over time, and then look at all of their contacts and see how many additional people were infected,” Van Kerkhove said.

“And that’s a very small subset of studies. So I was responding to a question at the press conference. I wasn’t stating a policy of WHO or anything like that,” she said. “Because this is a major unknown, because there are so many unknowns around this, some modeling groups have tried to estimate what is the proportion of asymptomatic people that may transmit.”

How the virus spreads

Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO Health Emergencies Program, also said during the live Q&A that there is still much to learn about the possible asymptomatic spread of the coronavirus.

How coronavirus spread from one member to 87% of the singers at a Washington choir practice

“Whatever proportion of disease is transmitting from asymptomatic individuals, as Maria said, that is unknown,” Ryan said.

“I’m absolutely convinced that that is occurring. The question is how much,” he said. “There’s much to be answered on this. There’s much that is unknown.”

‘Trying to slice the salami very fine’

Whether someone is presymptomatic or or simply experiencing very mild symptoms is not of importance to the person on the receiving end of the transmission, said Dr. William Schaffner, a Vanderbilt University professor and longtime adviser to the CDC.

“I thought they were getting very prissy and trying to slice the salami very fine,” Schaffner said about WHO’s comments on Monday on asymptomatic spread.

“You can be vertical and feel 100% or virtually 100% and going about your daily business and unaware that you’re infected and perfectly capable transmitting the virus,” Schaffner said. “How do we inhibit transmission of the virus by these people who are doing their full range of normal activities? The answer is social distancing and wearing masks and good hand hygiene and stay away from crowds. That’s the formula.”

Liam Smeeth, professor of clinical epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said that he was “quite surprised” by Van Kerkhove’s original comments.

“It goes against my impressions from the science so far that suggest asymptomatic (people who never get symptoms) and pre-symptomatic people are an important source of infection to others,” Smeeth said In a written statement distributed by the UK-based Science Media Centre on Tuesday.
“This is the main basis for steps such as self-isolation and lockdown — steps we know, from yesterday’s two Nature papers have massively reduced the numbers of people infected and have prevented millions of deaths globally,” he said. He was referring to research that estimates shutdown measures through early April prevented more than 500 million coronavirus infections across six countries.

“There remains scientific uncertainty, but asymptomatic infection could be around 30% to 50% of cases,” Smeeth said. “The best scientific studies to date suggest that up to half of cases became infected from asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people.”

Source link

Written by Angle News

Leave a Reply

Stassi Schroeder, Kristen Doute, Max Boyens and Brett Caprioni are FIRED from Vanderpump Rules

Hollyoaks accused of MORE discrimination as Laila Rouass claims bosses forced her to strip off